Today I had the pleasure of reading Randall Buth’s article, “Verbs Perception and Aspect: Greek Lexicography and Grammar.” It’s refreshing to read a Biblical Scholar talking about the work of Stephen Krashen on language acquisition.
While I did not find Buth’s argument about the aspect of Greek perfects convincing, his arguments for using the infinitival forms as the lemma in a lexicon is well informed and well presented. He argues for listing both the aorist and present infinitives, giving the aorist first place.
In the early part of the article he gives an insightful and challenging account of what happens in Biblical Greek classrooms and an honest acknowledgment of the results. This account forms the background for his proposal of a different type of lexicon. I would like to propose, though, that his critique has more far reaching implications. For the good of the field, we need major changes in the way Hellenistic Greek is taught. The methods currently employed do not produce fluent readers who can “think in Greek.”
I’ll try to find time later to write a post on the implications of Krashen’s work for the way we teach Greek. I have struggled with this issue for many years.
2 Replies to “Randall Buth on Greek Lexicography”
Where can one find Randall Buth’s article, “Verbs Perception and Aspect: Greek Lexicography and Grammar”?
It’s in Biblical Greek Language and Lexicography, edited by Bernard Taylor, John A.L. Lee, Peter Burton, and Richard Whitaker. I bought my copy through Amazon.com for about $4.00. It is used, but in excellent condition.
Comments are closed.